CHEN Yun.The measurement of Rural Revitalization development level[J].Journal of Yanbian University,2020,46(03):233-241.
乡村振兴发展水平测度研究
- Title:
- The measurement of Rural Revitalization development level
- 文章编号:
- 1004-4353(2020)03-0233-09
- Keywords:
- Rural Revitalization; measurement of development level; improved entropy weight method; grey relational analysis
- 分类号:
- O141.4; F323
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效和生活富裕5个维度构建了乡村振兴发展的测度指标体系,并以厦门、漳州和泉州为例,采用改进熵权法与灰色关联分析算法相结合的方法对其乡村振兴发展水平进行了测度.测度结果显示,厦门、漳州和泉州的乡村振兴在各维度的发展水平上均存在一定差别.其中:厦门在生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效和生活富裕4个维度的发展水平最高,其灰色关联度值分别为0.935、0.728、0.859、0.918; 漳州在产业兴旺维度的发展水平最高,其灰色关联度值为0.656,但是在生态宜居和治理有效2个维度的发展水平显著低于厦门和泉州,其灰色关联度值仅为0.388和0.360; 泉州在上述5个维度的发展水平均表现一般,其5个维度的灰色关联度值均在0.5左右.3个城市的乡村振兴综合发展水平由高到低的排序为厦门、漳州、泉州.本文研究结果不仅丰富了乡村振兴发展测度的研究方法,而且也为厦门、漳州和泉州的乡村振兴发展提供了良好的参考依据.
- Abstract:
- The measurement index system of Rural Revitalization development is constructed from five dimensions: industrial prosperity, ecological livability, rural civilization, effective governance and well -to -do life. Taking Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou as examples, the improved entropy weight method combined with grey correlation analysis is used to measure the Rural Revitalization development level. The results show that there are some differences in the development level of Rural Revitalization in Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou. Through the construction of the five dimensions of Rural Revitalization development level measurement index system, the level of Rural Revitalization in the three cities is measured by the method of the improved entropy weight and grey relational analysis. Through the practical application of Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou, it is found that there are some differences in the level of Rural Revitalization development. Among the three cities, Xiamen has the highest development level in the four dimensions of ecological livability, rural civilization, effective governance and well -to -do life, with the relational degree values of 0.935, 0.728, 0.859 and 0.918, respectively; The development level of Zhangzhou in the dimension of industrial prosperity is the highest, with the relational degree value of 0.656, while the development level of the two dimensions of ecological livability and effective governance is significantly lower than that of Xiamen and Quanzhou, and the relational degree values are only 0.388 and 0.360; The development level of Quanzhou in the five dimensions is average, and the relational degree value is about 0.5. The comprehensive development level of Rural Revitalization of the three cities is ranked from high to low as Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou. The results of this study not only enrich the research methods of Rural Revitalization development, but also provide a good reference for the Rural Revitalization development of Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou.
参考文献/References:
[1] 中共中央、国务院关于实施乡村振兴战略的意见[EB/OL](2018-02-04)[2020-06-15].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-02/04/content_5263807.htm.
[2] 乡村振兴战略规划(2018-2022年)[EB/OL](2018-09-26)[2020-06-15].http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2018/content_5331958.htm.
[3] 新华社.中共中央、国务院关于坚持农业农村优先发展做好“三农”工作的若干意见[EB/OL](2019-02-19)[2020-06-15].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-02/19/content_5366917.htm.
[4] 新华社.国务院关于促进乡村产业振兴的指导意见[EB/OL](2019-06-28)[2020-06-15].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-06/28/content_5404202.htm.
[5] 新华社.中共中央、国务院关于抓好“三农”领域重点工作确保如期实现全面小康的意见[EB/OL](2020-02-05)[2020-06-15].http://www.moa.gov.cn/ztzl/jj2020zyyhwj/2020zyyhwj/202002/t20200205_6336614.htm.
[6] 马学文.面向乡村振兴的河北省农村人居环境整治困境及对策研究[D].石家庄:河北师范大学,2020.
[7] 朱显平,姜杨.乡村振兴战略下吉林省乡村旅游的发展逻辑、障碍及路径选择[J].延边大学学报(社会科学版),2019,52(4):89-95.
[8] 韩莉莉.乡村治理体系的形成及其对乡村规划的启示分析[J].财经界(学术版),2020(16):244-245.
[9] 管文行.乡村振兴背景下农村治理主体结构研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2019.
[10] 周栋良.乡村振兴评价指标体系构建研究[J].湖南生态科学学报,2019,6(3):60-64.
[11] 吴雯婷.乡村振兴战略下我国精准扶贫面临的困境及对策研究[J].全国流通经济,2020(12):93-95.
[12] 范荣,何颖.徐州市乡村振兴战略评价体系研究[J].金融经济,2019(10):38-40.
[13] 李洪斌,舒晓惠.基于层次分析法的湖南省乡村振兴综合评价[J].商讯,2020(5):3-4.
[14] 陈培彬,谢源,王海平,等.福建省乡村振兴实施成效分析及其优化路径:基于2015—2019年9地市面板数据[J].世界农业,2020(1):98-107.
[15] 倪广亚,刘学录,李沁汶,等.基于数据信息特征的土地资源评价客观赋权方法的研究[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(20):255-262.
[16] 郭延华,李乐昱.基于改进熵权-突变级数法的岩爆等级评判[J].河北工程大学学报(自然科学版),2019,36(3):67-71.
[17] 彭云飞,沈曦.经济管理中常用数量方法[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2011:238-282.
备注/Memo
收稿日期: 2020-07-15 作者简介: 陈云(1978—),女,副教授,研究方向为数学模型应用、数据分析.
基金项目: 中华职业教育社总社基金资助项目(ZJS20200541); 黎明职业大学科研团队建设项目(LMTD2018101)